My Lord,
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of Your Lordship's despatch of the 15th February, referring to a despatch of the 14th February last conveying Earl Russell's instructions to Sir R. Alcock regarding a despatch from the Prince of Kung in which the arrest of a criminal at Hongkong was spoken of.
I have to state that the Chinese Government had no intention of implying that they claimed jurisdiction over the Chinese in Hongkong. Earl Russell's despatch reached Peking some weeks after my despatch in question had been carried to the knowledge of the Prince of Kung by Sir R. Wade, the then British Minister, who submitted it to the Prince.
The Chinese Government was immediately informed, and I have only to regret that it was not at once reported to Your Lordship.
Sir R. Wade requests me to state that when he first read the Prince's note, he drew attention to the obscure passage, but that he and his colleagues then affirmed, as they have now repeated, that...
Copy Peking, May 2/66
Page 366
However, to follow the exact instruction for output format using HTML with proper reordering and proofreading:My Lord,
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of Your Lordship's despatch of the 15th February, referring to a despatch of the 14th February last conveying Earl Russell's instructions to Sir R. Alcock regarding a despatch from the Prince of Kung in which the arrest of a criminal at Hongkong was spoken of.
The Chinese fort had no intention of implying that they claimed jurisdiction over the Chinese in that Colony.
I have to state that Earl Russell's despatch reached Peking some weeks after my despatch in question had been carried to the knowledge of the Prince of Kung by Sir R. Wade, the then British Minister, who submitted it to the Prince of Kung.
The Chinese Government was immediately informed and I have only to regret that it was not at once reported to Your Lordship.
Sir R. Wade requests me to state that when he first read the Prince's note, he drew attention to the obscure passage, but that he and his colleagues then affirmed, as they have now repeated.
Copy Peking, May 2/66
Page 366
from which
will learn
zow that
The Chinese fort.
кор
in the corresponding which pased cop that Creminat,
had no intention
of implying that
I had any Juridiction
器
Over
the Chinese
in Hongkong.
Н
Copy
Peking. May 2/66
366
I have the honors to ack. 4. L's desp.
My Lord.
of the
"the 15th Seb. referring
due to a
desp: of the 14to Bet: last conveying
Earl
Russell's instructions to Eur Wade regarding a despi-
from the Prince of lung in wh the arrest of a Criminal at Honghong
imply.
over
spoken of
To
that the Chinese fort claimed jurisdictio the Chinese in that Colony. Earl Russell's desp: reached Bcking
arrival a by my
after my in question
Affairs by
ར
some weeks
desire the Chinese desp=
was carried to the gamen of Foreign
It Wade a submitted by the Mister, to the Prince of King. The Changs
its members, to the Prince
required
was immediately made & I have only to: regret that it was not at once reported to y.d.
4.6.
Sur Wade requests me to state that when the first
reed the Prince's note he drew the attention
of 4.2.
now
repeated.
that
Weusing to the obuccions passage but that he & his colleagues then affirmed, as they have
Carl of Clarendon
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.